International Aid: Treasury Update — 13 Jul 2021 at 15:51

The majority of MPs voted to say MPs had considered a statement on international aid, the Chancellor had stated the Government would interpret this vote as a vote to continue a policy of spending 0.5% of gross national income spent on international aid, rather than at least 0.7%.

The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

While, on a literal reading of the motion alone, the result of this vote had no impact either way, it appears the Chancellor had promised the Government would interpret a vote against as a vote for spending [at least] 0.7% of Gross National Income on international aid in the next year.

The statement, made by the Chancellor, Rishi Sunak, MP included:

  • we took the decision last year to temporarily reduce the ODA budget to spend 0.5 per cent of gross national income on overseas aid in 2021.
  • ...
  • Consistent with the fiscal principles set out at March Budget 2021, and with the principles contained within the Conservative Party 2019 Manifesto, the government commits to spending 0.7% of GNI on ODA when the independent Office for Budget Responsibility’s fiscal forecast confirms that, on a sustainable basis, we are not borrowing for day-to-day spending and underlying debt is falling, ...
  • ...
  • A motion will be tabled by the government alongside this Written Ministerial Statement asking the House of Commons to consider this approach, for debate tomorrow. If the House approves the motion, recognising the need to manage the public finances responsibly and maintaining strong investment in domestic public services like the NHS, schools and police, then the government will continue with the approach set out in this Statement. However, if the House were to negative the motion, rejecting the government’s assessment of the fiscal circumstances, then the government would consequently return to spending 0.7% of GNI on international aid in the next calendar year, and with likely consequences for the fiscal situation, including for taxation and current public spending plans.

The motion which was subject to this vote was the only motion on the subject of the statement on the order paper[1].

That the Chancellor appeared to promise the Government would consider a vote against the motion a vote for spending [at least] 0.7% of Gross National Income on international aid can be taken into account when interpreting this vote. At the very least the Government could be challenged to keep its chancellor's promise.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alba0 20100.0%
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con332 (+2 tell) 24 (+1 tell)098.6%
DUP0 80100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 40100.0%
Lab0 197 (+1 tell)099.5%
LDem0 120100.0%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 450100.0%
Total:333 299099.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Sir David AmessSouthend WestCon (front bench)no
Harriett BaldwinWest WorcestershireCon (front bench)no
Peter BottomleyWorthing WestCon (front bench)no
Karen BradleyStaffordshire MoorlandsCon (front bench)no
Steve BrineWinchesterCon (front bench)no
Rehman ChishtiGillingham and RainhamConno
Stephen CrabbPreseli PembrokeshireCon (front bench)no
David DavisHaltemprice and HowdenConno
Tobias EllwoodBournemouth EastCon (front bench)no
Roger GaleNorth ThanetCon (front bench)no
Damian GreenAshfordCon (front bench)no
Simon HoareNorth DorsetCon (front bench)no
Neil HudsonPenrith and The BorderCon (front bench)no
Jeremy HuntSouth West SurreyCon (front bench)no
Pauline LathamMid DerbyshireCon (front bench)no
Tim LoughtonEast Worthing and ShorehamCon (front bench)no
Anthony MangnallTotnesCon (front bench)tellno
Theresa MayMaidenheadConno
Johnny MercerPlymouth, Moor ViewCon (front bench)no
Andrew MitchellSutton ColdfieldConno
Caroline NokesRomsey and Southampton NorthCon (front bench)no
Neil ParishTiverton and HonitonCon (front bench)no
Mark PawseyRugbyCon (front bench)no
Bob SeelyIsle of WightCon (front bench)no
Thomas TugendhatTonbridge and MallingCon (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive