Nationality and Borders Bill — Report (2nd Day) (Continued) — Amendment 55 — 2 Mar 2022 at 22:15

Moved by Lord Coaker

55: Clause 39, page 40, leave out lines 5 to 9Member’s explanatory statementThis would prevent ‘arrival’ in the UK being an offence, rather than ‘entry’ into the UK.

Ayes 101, Noes 96.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 04.2%
Con0 9134.1%
Crossbench6 24.5%
DUP0 120.0%
Green1 050.0%
Lab36 020.5%
LDem53 063.1%
Non-affiliated4 18.8%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:101 9624.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Green of DeddingtonCrossbenchno
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive