John Redwood MP, Wokingham

voted ambiguously on the policy

Regulate nicotine and tobacco sales + advertising

by scoring 54.7% compared to the votes below

Why Majority/minority instead of Aye/No?
HouseDateSubjectJohn RedwoodPolicy vote
Commons22 Jan 2001Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill — Decline Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons22 Jan 2001Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill — Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons22 Jan 2001Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill [Money] minorityMajority (strong)
Commons13 Feb 2001Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill — Prohibition or Restriction of use of Symbol, Name or Emblem absentminority
Commons13 Feb 2001Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill — Third Reading absentMajority (strong)
HouseDateSubjectJohn RedwoodPolicy vote
Commons29 Apr 2002Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill — Second Reading minorityminority (strong)
HouseDateSubjectJohn RedwoodPolicy vote
Commons10 Feb 2014Children and Families Bill — Prohibition on Purchasing Tobacco for a Child and Regulation of Tobacco Products MajorityMajority (strong)
Commons11 Mar 2015Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations 2015 minorityMajority (strong)
HouseDateSubjectJohn RedwoodPolicy vote
Commons11 Apr 2016Finance Bill 2015-16 to 2016-17 — Second Reading MajorityMajority (strong)
Commons6 Sep 2016Finance Bill — Third Reading MajorityMajority (strong)
Commons18 Apr 2017Finance (No. 2) Bill 2017 — Decline Second Reading MajorityMajority (strong)
Commons18 Apr 2017Finance (No. 2) Bill 2017 — Second Reading MajorityMajority (strong)
HouseDateSubjectJohn RedwoodPolicy vote
Commons12 Sep 2017Finance Bill 2017-19 — Second Reading MajorityMajority
Commons31 Oct 2017Finance Bill — Third Reading MajorityMajority
HouseDateSubjectJohn RedwoodPolicy vote
Commons22 Nov 2021Health and Care Bill — New Clause 4 — Packaging and Labelling of Nicotine Products Majorityminority (strong)
Commons30 Mar 2022Health and Care Bill — After Clause 148 — Tobacco Products Statutory Scheme: Consultation Majorityminority

How the number is calculated

The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.

Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.

No of votesPointsOut of
Most important votes (50 points)   
MP voted with policy6300300
MP voted against policy50250
MP absent12550
Less important votes (10 points)   
MP voted with policy22020
MP voted against policy1010
Less important absentees (2 points)   
MP absent*112
Total:346632

*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.

agreement score
MP's points
total points
 = 
346
632
 = 54.7 %.


About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive