Voting Comparison — Lord Rooker
to Baroness Nicol
Lord Rooker
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
| Constituency | From | To | Party | Rebellions (explain...) | Attendance (explain...) | Teller |
| House of Lords | 21 Jun 2001 | still in office | Lab | 36 votes out of 1778, 2.0% | 1778 votes out of 2616, 68.0% | 2 times |
| Birmingham, Perry Barr | 1 May 1997 | 14 May 2001 | Lab | 9 votes out of 967, 0.9% | 967 votes out of 1273, 76.0% | 0 times |
Voting Differences
| House | Date | Subject | Lord Rooker | Baroness Nicol | Rôle | |
| Lords | 28 Oct 2003 | Hunting Bill: amendment — hunting to protect sheep on fell or moorland in National Park | Majority | no | disagrees with policy | |
| Lords | 21 Oct 2003 | Hunting Bill — amendment — registered hunting | Majority | no | disagrees with policy | |
| Lords | 21 Oct 2003 | Hunting Bill: amendment — "intentional" hunting | Majority | no | disagrees with policy | |
| Lords | 19 Mar 2002 | Hunting with dogs: Hunting under Licence | Majority | no | disagrees with policy | |
| Lords | 19 Mar 2002 | Hunting with dogs: Ban | Majority | aye | disagrees with policy | |
| House | Date | Subject | Mr Jeff Rooker | Baroness Nicol | Rôle | |
| no votes listed | ||||||