Why Majority/minority instead of Aye/No?
House | Date | Subject | Mr Raymond Powell | Policy vote |
Commons | 19 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Second Reading |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 19 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Programme — Committee of the Whole House |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 21 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Programme — Timetable of Debate |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 21 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — New Clause 6 — Sunset Clause |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 21 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Terrorist certification by Home Secretary |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 21 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Indefinite detention of suspected terrorists |
Majority | Majority (strong) |
Commons | 21 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Special Immigration Appeals Commission |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 21 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Clause 109 and 110 — Implementation of the third pillar |
absent | Majority |
Commons | 26 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Clauses 79 to 87 — Fissile Nuclear Material, Aviation Security |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 26 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Amendment to Clause 89 — Identification at a Police Station |
Majority | Majority (strong) |
Commons | 26 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Amendment to Clause 97 — Jurisdiction of MoD police |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 26 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Clauses 101 to 105, 120 to 122 — Communication Data |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 26 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Amendment to Clause 17 — Disclosure Powers |
Majority | Majority |
Commons | 26 Nov 2001 | Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Third Reading |
Majority | Majority |
The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes
get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the
MP was absent get 2 points.
In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy,
no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting.
In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy,
no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.
Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.
| No of votes | Points | Out of |
---|
Most important votes (50 points) | | | |
MP voted with policy | 2 | 100 | 100 |
MP voted against policy | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MP absent | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Less important votes (10 points) | | | |
MP voted with policy | 11 | 110 | 110 |
MP voted against policy | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Less important absentees (2 points) | | | |
MP absent* | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Total: | 211 | 212 |
*Pressure of
other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not
always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote
makes a disproportionatly small difference. |
agreement score =
MP's points
total points
=
211
212
= 99.5 %.