Hunting with dogs: Supervision — 19 Mar 2002 at 18:50
a free "indicative" vote to guide the Government on how to deal with the issue of hunting with dogs. Those voting "content" in this division were supporting the self-regulation of hunting with dogs - in accordance with provision similar to Schedule 1 to the Hunting Bill as introduced in the Commons in Session 2000–01 [Bill 2].
Other votes covered the options of licensing scheme and a ban. The House of Commons had held its own "indicative" votes the previous day.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 97; Not-Contents, 119.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||7||75 (+2 tell)||38.0%|
|Lab||77 (+1 tell)||2||41.2%|
|LDem||18 (+1 tell)||3||33.3%|
|Hodgson of Astley Abbotts||Con||no|
|The of Onslow||Con||no|
|Currie of Marylebone||Crossbench||no|
|Howarth of Breckland||Crossbench||no|
|May of Oxford||Crossbench||no|
|Richardson of Calow||Crossbench||no|
|King of West Bromwich||Lab||aye|
|Mason of Barnsley||Lab||aye|
|Livsey of Talgarth||LDem||aye|