[S2M-661] Decision Time — 27 Nov 2003 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-661
The description in the bulletin on 2003-11-26 is:
*S2M-661 Mr Tom McCabe: Physical Activity: The Need for Improvement and the Cost of Failure-That the Parliament acknowledges the significance of the Scottish Executive's physical activity strategy Let's Make Scotland More Active as the approach to tackling the serious, nationwide problem of inactivity; acknowledges the need for urgency and the action taken thus far to tackle inactivity in Scotland as part of the Executive's wide-reaching programme to improve health in Scotland; welcomes the Executive's plans to emphasise walking as the means of increasing levels of physical activity in Scotland, and supports the Executive's intentions to secure national leadership for physical activity in Scotland. Supported by: Mr Frank McAveety*
You can search for this motion (S2M-661) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The seventh and final question is, that motion S2M-661, in the name of Tom McCabe, on physical activity, be agreed to. Are we agreed? That is agreed to. <[em>Interruption.] I am sorry, you must shout louder. Is that agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 14 | 0 | 77.8% |
Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 70.6% |
SNP | 24 | 0 | 0 | 92.3% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 3 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
Total: | 97 | 14 | 1 | 87.5% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote