[S2M-1374] Decision Time — 2 Jun 2004 at 17:04
This looks like the vote on S2M-1374
The description in the bulletin on 2004-06-02 is:
*S2M-1374 Mr John Swinney: International Situation-That the Parliament reaffirms its support for the United Nations and its belief in the primacy of international law; believes that the war in Iraq was both illegal and based on a deception as evidenced by the failure to find weapons of mass destruction; believes that as a consequence the world is now a more dangerous place; notes that the unstable security situation and the current rules of engagement within Iraq have led to the coalition forces being seen as an army of occupation, and believes, therefore, that to promote future stability in Iraq any foreign troops on Iraqi soil should be brought under UN command and that current coalition forces should be replaced, on a phased basis, by those drawn from non-Western, preferably Muslim, countries pending the restoration of full sovereignty and the consent of the Iraqi people.
You can search for this motion (S2M-1374) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fifth question is, that motion S2M-1374, in the name of John Swinney, on the international situation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 2 | 100.0% |
Lab | 43 | 0 | 3 | 92.0% |
LDem | 0 | 0 | 16 | 94.1% |
SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 96.2% |
SSP | 1 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 62 | 38 | 21 | 95.3% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote