[S2M-2096.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 2 Dec 2004 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S2M-2096.3
The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-02 is:
*S2M-2096.3 Mr Ted Brocklebank: Towards a Sustainable Aquaculture Industry—As an amendment to motion (S2M-2096) in the name of Lewis Macdonald, insert at end "but questions the timetable and scope of the proposed Aquaculture bill; further notes that the Executive has still failed to meet 14 targets it set out in the Strategic Framework for Scottish Aquaculture, and laments that it has taken it six years to set up a review into the current regulatory framework with a view to lightening the burden of regulation that threatens to choke the industry."
You can search for this motion (S2M-2096.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-2096.3, in the name of Ted Brocklebank, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2096, in the name of Lewis Macdonald, on a sustainable aquaculture industry, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 91.8% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 18 | 0 | 72.0% |
| SSP | 5 | 0 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 77 | 34 | 1 | 88.2% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote