[S2M-2166.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 16 Dec 2004 at 17:08

This looks like the vote on S2M-2166.2

The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-16 is:

*S2M-2166.2 Brian Adam: Tourism - Ambitions for Scotland—As an amendment to motion (S2M-2166) in the name of Patricia Ferguson, leave out from "approves" to end and insert "further recognises that tourism requires good access and good tourism experiences as well as marketing strategies; expresses concern over the uncertainties introduced by the Tourism Network Scotland (TNS) project, including potential compulsory redundancies, the financial shortfall and lack of a detailed business plan; commends the development of niche marketing strategies and the extension of the seasonal events to ensure that all Scotland benefits from a growing industry; seeks continued commitment to improving access through the Route Development Fund and a strategy for dealing with the consequences of changes to structural funds, and calls on the Scottish Executive, contingent upon production of the TNS business plan, to consider making available transitional funding to address any shortfall due to potential loss of membership income, local authority funding, redundancy costs and the ongoing structural deficit."

You can search for this motion (S2M-2166.2) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The next question is, that amendment S2M-2166.2, in the name of Brian Adam, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2166, in the name of Patricia Ferguson, on tourism, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |