Crossrail Bill — 19 Jul 2005 at 21:44
Jamie Reed MP, Copeland voted with the majority (Aye).
The issue in this division was whether to approve the principle of Crossrail, a new cross-London railway line running east to west. Those voting Aye approved of the principle.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||39||17 (+2 tell)||0||29.6%|
|Lab||312 (+2 tell)||0||0||88.7%|
|Adam Afriyie||Windsor||Con (front bench)||no|
|David Amess||Southend West||Con (front bench)||no|
|Brian Binley||Northampton South||Con (front bench)||no|
|James Duddridge||Rochford and Southend East||Con (front bench)||no|
|Eric Forth||Bromley and Chislehurst||Con (front bench)||no|
|Mark Lancaster||North East Milton Keynes||Con (front bench)||tellno|
|Edward Leigh||Gainsborough||Con (front bench)||no|
|Ian Liddell-Grainger||Bridgwater||Con (front bench)||no|
|Peter Luff||Mid Worcestershire||Con (front bench)||no|
|Owen Paterson||North Shropshire||Con||no|
|John Penrose||Weston-Super-Mare||Con (front bench)||no|
|Laurence Robertson||Tewkesbury||Con (front bench)||no|
|Andrew Rosindell||Romford||Con (front bench)||tellno|
|Bob Spink||Castle Point||whilst Con||no|
|Andrew Turner||Isle of Wight||Con (front bench)||no|
|Ben Wallace||Lancaster and Wyre||Con (front bench)||no|
|Robert Walter||North Dorset||Con (front bench)||no|