[S2M-3411] Decision Time — 26 Oct 2005 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S2M-3411
The description in the bulletin on 2005-10-17 is:
*S2M-3411 Mr Duncan McNeil: Report on Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload—That the Parliament endorses the prioritisation criteria set out in paragraphs 7 to 9 of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s 2nd Report, 2005 (Session 2): Report on the Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload (SP Paper 434) and therefore agrees the recommendations in paragraph 19 of the report. Supported by: Nora Radcliffe*, John Scott*
The description in the bulletin on 2005-10-24 is:
S2M-3411 Mr Duncan McNeil on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body: Report on Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload—That the Parliament endorses the prioritisation criteria set out in paragraphs 7 to 9 of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s 2nd Report, 2005 (Session 2): Report on the Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload (SP Paper 434) and therefore agrees the recommendations in paragraph 19 of the report. Supported by: Nora Radcliffe, John Scott
The description in the bulletin on 2005-10-26 is:
S2M-3411 Report on Prioritisation of the Non-Executive Bills Unit’s Workload (lodged on 11 October 2005) Mr Andrew Welsh*
You can search for this motion (S2M-3411) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S2M-3411, in the name of Duncan McNeil, on a report on the prioritisation of NEBU's workload, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
All Votes Cast - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote