[S2M-3837.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 19 Jan 2006 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-3837.3
The description in the bulletin on 2006-01-19 is:
*S2M-3837.3 Mr Mark Ruskell: Air Route Development Fund—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3837) in the name of Tavish Scott, leave out from “endorses” to end and insert “questions the success of the Air Route Development Fund (ARDF) in bringing sustainable development benefits to Scotland; further questions whether economic advantages have flowed to the Scottish economy from the ARDF; supports the development of an international regime that reduces overall aviation emissions; notes that promoting expansion of aviation undermines existing emissions targets and that projected growth in aviation would necessitate cessation of economic activity in other sectors in order to achieve targets; notes that the net cost of aviation to the Scottish economy was £1.4 billion in 2004 and that the United Kingdom accounts for 87% of tourist visits to Scotland; supports work to improve rail journey times between Scotland and London in order to reduce the reliance on domestic short-haul flights but notes the lack of progress in this respect, and condemns the further use of public funds for the ARDF.” Supported by: Mark Ballard* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S2M-3837.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S2M-3837.3, in the name of Mark Ruskell, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3837, in the name of Tavish Scott, on the air route development fund, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
All Votes Cast - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote