[S2M-3866.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 4 May 2006 at 17:01

This looks like the vote on S2M-3866.4

The description in the bulletin on 2006-05-04 is:

*S2M-3866.4 Jackie Baillie: Replacement of Trident—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3866) in the name of Chris Ballance, leave out from "believes" to end and insert "notes that in 2005 the UK Government reaffirmed its commitment to all its obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty 1967; notes the commitment of all three major UK parties to retain an independent nuclear deterrent; notes the comments of the UK Government that no decisions on replacing Trident have yet been taken; believes there should be the fullest possible public debate on any decision to replace the Trident nuclear weapons system, considering all possible options including non-replacement; notes the significant reductions in the United Kingdom’s nuclear weapons arsenal; is committed to the goal of the global elimination of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, and wishes to see the United Kingdom continue to work both bilaterally and through the United Nations to urge states not yet party to non-proliferation instruments to become so, to remain committed to the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and to make further progress toward significant reductions in the nuclear arsenals of the major nuclear powers." Supported by: Scott Barrie* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support

You can search for this motion (S2M-3866.4) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The first question is, that amendment S2M-3866.4, in the name of Jackie Baillie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3866, in the name of Chris Ballance, on the replacement of Trident, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |