[S2M-5336] Decision Time — 11 Jan 2007 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-5336
The description in the bulletin on 2006-12-18 is:
*S2M-5336 Cathy Jamieson: Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Johann Lamont*
The description in the bulletin on 2007-01-08 is:
S2M-5336 Cathy Jamieson: Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Johann Lamont
You can search for this motion (S2M-5336) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S2M-5336, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, that the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 2 | 15 | 100.0% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 6 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SG | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 22 | 0 | 0 | 88.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 3 | 75.0% |
| Total: | 87 | 2 | 28 | 92.1% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote