[S2M-5608.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 21 Feb 2007 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-5608.1
The description in the bulletin on 2007-02-21 is:
*S2M-5608.1 Mr Kenny MacAskill: Community Safety—As an amendment to motion (S2M-5608) in the name of Johann Lamont, leave out from "acknowledges" to end and insert "recognises the concern and anxiety in our communities caused by both low-level antisocial behaviour and serious and violent crime; appreciates the increased burden placed on our police forces by new legislation and additional requirements; believes that the best way of tackling both serious crime and antisocial behaviour is a visible police presence to reassure the public and deter criminals, and therefore commits to the recruitment of 1,000 additional police officers for our communities."
You can search for this motion (S2M-5608.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S2M-5608.1, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5608, in the name of Johann Lamont, on community safety, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SG | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 88.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 85 | 23 | 9 | 91.4% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote