Serious Crime Bill [HL] — 25 Apr 2007 at 18:40

Baroness Billingham was absent

moved AmendmentNo. 37:

Clause 33, page 22, line 19, at end insert-
"(3) Notwithstanding this, the rules on admissibility of evidence to be observed in such proceedings shall be the same as those observed in trials on indictment; and no person shall be required in such proceedings to answer any question or to produce any document which he could not be required to answer or produce in similar proceedings in a trial on indictment."

On Question, Whether the said amendment(No. 37) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 43; Not-Contents, 115.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con1 11.0%
Green0 1100.0%
Ind Lab0 1100.0%
Lab106 (+2 tell) 050.0%
LDem0 36 (+2 tell)48.1%
UUP1 033.3%
Crossbench5 23.7%
Total:113 4122.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive