|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home News Divisions MPs Lords MSPs Policies Forum Join Us Help / FAQ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill — Fertility treatment requires father and mother — rejected — 20 May 2008 at 18:30
The majority of MPs voted against requiring the need for both a father and a mother to be considered when taking account of the welfare of a child who may be born as a result of fertility treatment. Instead, the law will stipulate the need for "supportive parenting". The current text in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 says:[1]
The new Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill under discussion will substitute "a father" for "supportive parenting".[2] The vote, which was lost, would have instead changed "a father" to "a father and a mother" as it was written in the 1990 law.[3]
Debate in Parliament | Source | Edit (learn more) | Discussion (last edited 2 May 2008 by julian) Party SummaryVotes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party. What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby. What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this. What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Rebel Voters - sorted by partyMPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||