Legislation (Territorial Extent) Bill — Third Reading — Impact of Bills on Each Part of the United Kingdom — 9 Sep 2011 at 13:15
Mark Reckless MP, Rochester and Strood did not vote.
The majority of MPs voted against the legal and financial effect of draft Bills on each part of the United Kingdom to be separately and clearly identified.
MPs were considering the Legislation (Territorial Extent) Bill. The following motion was rejected in this vote:
- That the Bill be now read the Third time.
The rejection of the motion meant the Bill was dropped and made no further progress towards becoming law.
The effect of the Bill was intended to be as summarised above.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||18 (+2 tell)||21 (+2 tell)||0||14.1%|
|Conor Burns||Bournemouth West||Con||no|
|James Duddridge||Rochford and Southend East||Con||tellno|
|Chris Grayling||Epsom and Ewell||Con||no|
|Philip Hammond||Runnymede and Weybridge||Con||no|
|Mark Harper||Forest of Dean||Con||no|
|Nick Herbert||Arundel and South Downs||Con||no|
|Tim Loughton||East Worthing and Shoreham||Con||no|
|John Randall||Uxbridge and South Ruislip||Con||no|
|Andrew Robathan||South Leicestershire||Con||no|
|Hugh Robertson||Faversham and Mid Kent||Con||no|
|Hugo Swire||East Devon||Con||no|
|Theresa Villiers||Chipping Barnet||Con||no|
|Angela Watkinson||Hornchurch and Upminster||Con||tellno|
|Gerald Kaufman||Manchester, Gorton||Lab||both|