[S1M-2162] Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill — 6 Sep 2001 at 10:08
This looks like the vote on S1M-2162
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-05 is:
*S1M-2162 Sarah Boyack: Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill be treated as an emergency bill. Supported by: Lewis Macdonald*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2162) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The question is, that motion S1M-2162, in the name of Sarah Boyack, on treating the Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill as an emergency bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 12 | 0 | 0 | 63.2% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 0 | 24 | 0 | 72.7% |
Total: | 73 | 25 | 0 | 77.8% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote