[S1M-2078.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 19 Sep 2001 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-2078.2
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-19 is:
*S1M-2078.2 Alex Fergusson on behalf of the Rural Development Committee: Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill-As an amendment to motion (S1M-2078) in the name of Mike Watson, leave out from "agrees" to end and insert "does not agree to the general principles of the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill for the reasons set out in the stage 1 report of the Rural Development Committee; and because it considers that, as an alternative, the Executive should examine the issues identified in the report, in particular paragraph 72 thereof, in order to address whether the existing law against fox baiting provides adequate protection against cruelty to wild mammals."
You can search for this motion (S1M-2078.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The question is, that amendment S1M-2078.2, in the name of Alex Fergusson, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 1 | 18 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 51 | 0 | 0 | 92.7% |
| LDem | 8 | 7 | 0 | 93.8% |
| SNP | 27 | 2 | 1 | 90.9% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 92 | 27 | 1 | 93.8% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote