[S1M-2994] Decision Time — 18 Apr 2002 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S1M-2994
The description in the bulletin on 2002-04-17 is:
*S1M-2994 Cathy Jamieson: Social Care Workforce Development-That the Parliament commends the work of the social services workforce in local authorities, in voluntary organisations and in the private sector in providing vital services for older people, for children and their families and for people with disabilities and others, and in contributing to better community safety through work with offenders and in youth justice; notes the work already undertaken by the Executive to support the development of this workforce, and endorses the Executive's strategy and commitment to further work to secure a well trained workforce. Supported by: Nicol Stephen*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2994) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S1M-2994, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on social care work force development, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 0 | 14 | 73.7% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
Lab | 51 | 0 | 0 | 92.7% |
LDem | 12 | 0 | 2 | 87.5% |
SNP | 1 | 0 | 24 | 75.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 64 | 1 | 43 | 84.4% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote