[S1M-3429] Decision Time — 3 Oct 2002 at 17:05
This looks like the vote on S1M-3429
The description in the bulletin on 2002-09-26 is:
*S1M-3429 Mr Mike Rumbles on behalf of the Standards Committee: Replacing the Members' Interest Order: Proposal for a Committee Bill-That the Parliament agrees to the proposal for a Committee Bill under Rule 9.15 contained in the Standards Committee's 7th Report 2002, Replacing the Members' Interests Order: Proposal for a Committee Bill, (SP Paper 621).
The description in the bulletin on 2002-09-30 is:
S1M-3429 Mr Mike Rumbles on behalf of the Standards Committee: Replacing the Members' Interest Order: Proposal for a Committee Bill—That the Parliament agrees to the proposal for a Committee Bill under Rule 9.15 contained in the Standards Committee’s 7th Report 2002, Replacing the Members’ Interests Order: Proposal for a Committee Bill, (SP Paper 621).
You can search for this motion (S1M-3429) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that motion S1M-3429, in the name of Mike Rumbles, on behalf of the Standards Committee, on its "Report on Replacing the Members' Interests Order: Proposal for a Committee Bill", be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
That is a good example of how to shout. There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 11 | 4 | 0 | 78.9% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 1 | 83.6% |
| LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
| SNP | 26 | 0 | 1 | 81.8% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 97 | 4 | 4 | 82.0% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote