Use of hand-held electronic devices and social media in the chamber (Backbench Business) — 13 Oct 2011 at 15:24
Ian Davidson MP, Glasgow South West voted against allowing MPs to tweet from the commons chamber.
The majority of MPs voted against restricting the use of electronic devices in the House of Commons chamber in a manner which would have prevented MPs from using Twitter and other social media sites during debates.
Those MPs who voted "aye" were voting against allowing MPs to tweet from the commons chamber.
The text of the motion being debated was:
- That this House notes the Third Report from the Procedure Committee on Use of hand-held electronic devices in the Chamber and committees, HC 889; and resolves that hand-held devices (not laptops) may be used in the Chamber, provided that they are silent, and used in a way that does not impair decorum, that Members making speeches in the Chamber or in committee may refer to electronic devices in place of paper speaking notes and that electronic devices, including laptops, may be used silently in committee meetings, including select committees.
The division was on making the following, rejected, amendment:
- leave out from ‘Chamber’ to end and add ‘to a minimal extent, silently and with decorum, to receive and send urgent messages, as a substitute for paper speaking notes and to refer to documents for use in debates, but not for any other purpose.’.
The original, unammended, motion, was subsequently passed by the house without at vote.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||124 (+1 tell)||44 (+2 tell)||0||55.9%|
|Lab||57 (+1 tell)||14||1||28.3%|