Access to Justice Bill [Lords] — 21 Jul 1999

Lords Reasons for disagreeing to certain of the Commons amendments considered.

I beg to move, That this House does not insist on Commons amendments Nos. 27 to 30, to which the Lords have disagreed.

Lords Reason:

Because it is not appropriate for the Legal Services Commission itself to provide advice, assistance or representation to individuals involved in criminal investigations or criminal proceedings.

Question put , That this House does not insist on Commons amendments Nos. 27 to 30:--

The House divided: Ayes 294, Noes 166.

Historical Hansard | Online Hansard |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con0 126 (+2 tell)079.5%
Independent0 1050.0%
Lab293 (+2 tell) 0070.9%
LDem0 34073.9%
PC0 1025.0%
SDLP1 0033.3%
UUP0 4040.0%
Total:294 166072.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive