[S1M-408.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 13 Jan 2000 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S1M-408.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-01-13 is:
*S1M-408.1 Bill Aitken: Housing—As an amendment to motion (S1M-408) in the name of Ms Wendy Alexander, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "notes the Executive’s proposals to achieve this and notes that the Executive will bring forward a Housing Bill; calls upon the Executive to include within this Bill measures to deal with the alarming problem of homelessness which has increased dramatically since May 1997; welcomes the Executive’s commitment to extend the Right to Buy to Housing Association tenants, but emphasises that measures may be necessary to safeguard individual Associations where the take-up of this right could prejudice the operation, viability or success of these Associations."
You can search for this motion (S1M-408.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is that amendment S1M-408.1, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend motion S1M-408, in the name of Ms Wendy Alexander, on housing, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 94.4% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 90.9% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 27 | 0 | 0 | 81.8% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 95 | 17 | 0 | 88.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||