[S1M-461.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 27 Jan 2000 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-461.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-01-27 is:
*S1M-461.1 Mr John Swinney: Executive's Proposals as set out in the Framework Document on Wider Access to Further and Higher Education—As an amendment to motion (S1M-461) in the name of Henry McLeish, leave out from "endorses" to end and insert "resolves that the principle of free access to higher education must be restored; calls upon the Scottish Executive to abolish tuition fees for all Scottish students at UK universities and opposes the proposals for a Scottish Graduate Endowment as tuition fees by another name, and demands the implementation in full of the other recommendations of the Independent Inquiry into Student Finance." Supported by: Colin Campbell*, Andrew Wilson*, Mr Andrew Welsh*, Nicola Sturgeon*, Michael Russell*
You can search for this motion (S1M-461.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-461.1, in the name of Mr John Swinney, which seeks to amend motion S1M-461, in the name of Henry McLeish, on the Executive's proposals on wider access to further and higher education, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 17 | 0 | 0 | 94.4% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 53 | 0 | 0 | 96.4% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 0 | 31 | 0 | 93.9% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 85 | 36 | 0 | 95.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |