[S1M-517.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 24 Feb 2000 at 17:32
This looks like the vote on S1M-517.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-02-16 is:
*S1M-517.1 Dennis Canavan: Code of Conduct for Members—As an amendment to motion (S1M-517) in the name of Mr Mike Rumbles, insert after "Committee" "with the exception of paragraph 2.3 of section 2 of the code of conduct"
The description in the bulletin on 2000-02-17 is:
S1M-517.1 Code of Conduct for Members (lodged on 15 February 2000) Tommy Sheridan*
The description in the bulletin on 2000-02-21 is:
S1M-517.1 Dennis Canavan: Code of Conduct for Members—As an amendment to motion (S1M-517) in the name of Mr Mike Rumbles, insert after "Committee" "with the exception of paragraph 2.3 of section 2 of the code of conduct" Supported by: Tommy Sheridan
You can search for this motion (S1M-517.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The sixth question is, that amendment S1M-517.1, in the name of Dennis Canavan, seeking to amend motion S1M-517, in the name of Mike Rumbles, on the code of conduct for members, be agreed. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division. Those who wish to support Mr Canavan's amendment should press the yes button now.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 12 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 2 | 100.0% |
Lab | 44 | 0 | 0 | 80.0% |
LDem | 11 | 0 | 0 | 68.8% |
SNP | 0 | 0 | 25 | 75.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 67 | 3 | 27 | 76.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |