[S1M-858] Decision Time — 17 May 2000 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-858
The description in the bulletin on 2000-05-16 is:
*S1M-858 Ms Wendy Alexander: Glasgow Regeneration—That the Parliament endorses the wide-ranging action being taken by the Executive to ensure that all of the key agencies work together with the citizens of Glasgow to tackle the deep-rooted challenges facing the city; recognises the excellent work being done by the key players who form the Glasgow Alliance and the role they have to play in tackling these challenges, and notes the part the Executive has played in supporting the significant developments which will prepare Glasgow’s economy, housing, education provision and hospitals for the 21st century. Supported by: Henry McLeish*, Mr Frank McAveety*
You can search for this motion (S1M-858) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S1M-858, in the name of Wendy Alexander, on Glasgow regeneration, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 84.2% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 81.8% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 27 | 81.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 59 | 17 | 29 | 82.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||