[S1M-896.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 25 May 2000 at 17:04
This looks like the vote on S1M-896.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-05-25 is:
*S1M-896.1 Alex Johnstone: Rural Scotland: A New Approach—As an amendment to motion (S1M-896) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "notes the publication by the Scottish Executive of the document Rural Scotland: A New Approach; further notes the lack of progress which the Executive has made in placing rural Scots in the mainstream of its policies and activities, and calls upon the Executive to acknowledge that Scotland’s rural economy was in the past, and must continue to be in the future, based on its primary industries." Supported by: Alex Fergusson*, Mr Jamie McGrigor*
You can search for this motion (S1M-896.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S1M-896.1, in the name of Alex Johnstone, seeking to amend motion S1M-896, in the name of Ross Finnie, on "Rural Scotland: A New Approach", be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 78.9% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 27 | 81.8% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 64 | 15 | 27 | 84.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||