[S1M-921.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 1 Jun 2000 at 17:04
This looks like the vote on S1M-921.2
The description in the bulletin on 2000-06-01 is:
*S1M-921.2 Bill Aitken: Tackling Rough Sleeping in Glasgow and across Scotland—As an amendment to motion (S1M-921) in the name of Ms Wendy Alexander, insert at end: "and also recognises that concrete proposals are now essential to ensure that the commitments of the Executive are achieved, that these proposals must include provision for support to rough sleepers to enable them to obtain, and in turn to maintain, short and medium term tenancies with a view to enabling them to return to mainstream housing in the shortest possible time, and that such support should ensure that the needs of homeless people with drug, alcohol or mental health problems are met."
You can search for this motion (S1M-921.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S1M-921.2, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend motion S1M-921, in the name of Wendy Alexander, on tackling rough sleeping in Glasgow and across Scotland, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 13 | 0 | 68.4% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 27 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Total: | 63 | 41 | 0 | 81.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||