[S1M-1027.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 22 Jun 2000 at 17:31
This looks like the vote on S1M-1027.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-06-22 is:
*S1M-1027.1 Peter Peacock: McCrone Report—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1027) in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, leave out from "calls upon" to end and insert "welcomes the Executive’s approach to establish genuine consultation and partnership through constructive dialogue and mature consideration of the recommendations of the McCrone Report, and calls upon the Executive to maintain its progress towards the objective of securing a modern and flexible mechanism for determining the professional conditions of service for teachers in Scotland’s schools as a critical determinant in establishing a world class reputation for the Scottish education system". Supported by: Mr Sam Galbraith*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1027.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-1027.1, in the name of Peter Peacock, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1027, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, on the McCrone report, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 12 | 0 | 0 | 63.2% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 90.9% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 30 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Total: | 77 | 33 | 0 | 87.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||