Child Support, Pensions and Social Security Bill — 27 Jun 2000 at 17:34
Clause 48 [Modification of scheme to secure winding-up]:
[Amendment No. 87 not moved.]
Clause 49 [Reports about winding-up]:
[Amendments Nos. 88 to 92 not moved.]
Clause 50 [Directions for facilitating winding-up]:
[Amendments Nos. 93 to 96 not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 97:
After Clause 51, insert the following new clause--
:TITLE3:REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON PENSION ANNUITIES
(" . There shall be no requirement for a holder of a stakeholder, personal, occupational or other defined contributory pension to take the pension in the form of an annuity by a specified age.").
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 97) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 129; Not-Contents, 186.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 1 | 1 | 8.0% |
| Con | 0 | 110 (+2 tell) | 48.3% |
| Crossbench | 4 | 14 | 11.0% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 129 (+2 tell) | 0 | 65.8% |
| LDem | 48 | 0 | 77.4% |
| Total: | 184 | 125 | 45.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Alton of Liverpool | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Currie of Marylebone | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Patel | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Williamson of Horton | Crossbench | no |