Child Support, Pensions and Social Security Bill — 27 Jun 2000 at 19:57
[Amendment No. 108 not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 109:
Page 62, line 27, leave out from ("2") to ("it") in line 28.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
[Amendment No. 110 not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 111:
Page 62, leave out lines 31 and 32.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
[Amendment No. 112 not moved.]
Clause 61 [Composition of central advisory committee]:
[Amendments Nos. 113 and 114 not moved.]
Clause 63 [Loss of benefit for breach of community order]:
moved Amendment No. 114A:
Page 65, line 11, leave out from beginning to ("that") and insert ("a court makes a determination").
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 114A) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 170; Not-Contents, 116.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 2 | 0 | 8.0% |
| Con | 93 (+1 tell) | 0 | 40.5% |
| Crossbench | 15 | 4 | 11.6% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Socialist | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 1 | 109 (+2 tell) | 56.3% |
| LDem | 54 (+1 tell) | 0 | 88.7% |
| Total: | 166 | 114 | 41.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Currie of Marylebone | Crossbench | no |
| Baroness Greengross | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Powell of Bayswater | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Williamson of Horton | Crossbench | no |
| Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws | Lab | aye |