[S1M-1091.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 6 Jul 2000 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S1M-1091.2
The description in the bulletin on 2000-07-06 is:
*S1M-1091.2 Mary Scanlon: Modernisation in the NHS-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1091) in the name of Susan Deacon, leave out from first "the Scottish" to end and insert "that the delivery of a modern NHS requires both resources and reform; calls upon the Scottish Executive to abandon those policies which foster a spirit of divisiveness, to adopt policies which will restore the morale of the health service workers at all levels and to work with medical professionals and relevant authorities to address the need for investment in equipment and training and ensure that the £135 million underspend is fully committed to benefit patient care, and further calls for the development of a new approach to long-term and community care through unified health and social work budgets."
You can search for this motion (S1M-1091.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S1M-1091.2, in the name of Mary Scanlon, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1091, in the name of Susan Deacon, on modernisation in the NHS, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 28 | 84.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 65 | 18 | 32 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||