Lords Amendment — 26 Jul 2000 at 16:35

rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 7 but do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 7A and 7B in lieu thereof, to leave out the words after "House" and insert "do insist on its Amendment No. 7".

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 7C) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 131; Not-Contents, 137.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 75 (+2 tell)33.0%
Crossbench2 96.7%
Green0 1100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab132 (+2 tell) 067.0%
LDem0 4166.1%
UUP0 1100.0%
Total:135 12740.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Lord Currie of MaryleboneCrossbenchno
Lord Roll of IpsdenCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive