[S1M-1239.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 5 Oct 2000 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-1239.2
The description in the bulletin on 2000-10-05 is:
*S1M-1239.2 Mr Frank McAveety: Proportional Representation in Local Government-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1239) in the name of Mr Kenneth Gibson, leave out from "agrees" to end and insert "notes that the Partnership Agreement contains a commitment, following the publication of the final report of the McIntosh Commission, to an immediate programme of change including progress on electoral reform; notes too that the Executive established the Renewing Local Democracy Working Group chaired by Richard Kerley, and welcomes the decision by the Executive to establish a Ministerial Group to consider its recommendations and the Executive's commitment to continue to make progress on electoral reform and other issues relating to the modernisation of local government." Supported by: Iain Smith*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1239.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S1M-1239.2, in the name of Frank McAveety, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1239, in the name of Kenneth Gibson, on proportional representation in local government, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 54 | 0 | 0 | 98.2% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 0 | 31 | 0 | 93.9% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 69 | 54 | 0 | 96.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |