[S1M-1324.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 9 Nov 2000 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-1324.2
The description in the bulletin on 2000-11-09 is:
*S1M-1324.2 Nicola Sturgeon: NHS Governance and Accountability-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1324) in the name of Susan Deacon, insert at end "and further notes that the formulation and implementation of such proposals for change must fully involve both staff and the public and that such changes must be adequately resourced if they are to be successful." Supported by: Shona Robison*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1324.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-1324.2, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1324, in the name of Susan Deacon, on NHS governance and accountability, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 89.5% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 40 | 0 | 0 | 74.1% |
| LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 66.7% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 52 | 44 | 0 | 75.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||