Countryside and Rights of Way Bill — 23 Nov 2000 at 19:18

Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.

[Amendments Nos. 9 and 10 not moved.]

Clause 18 [Wardens]:

moved Amendment No. 11:

Page 12, line 5, leave out subsection (1) and insert--

("(1) Every access authority or district council shall take such steps (whether by the appointment of wardens or otherwise) as appear to it to be necessary or expedient to achieve the purpose set out in subsection (3) as respects access land in their area.").

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 11) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 55; Not-Contents, 160.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop0 13.8%
Con0 43 (+2 tell)19.4%
Crossbench2 86.2%
Lab111 (+2 tell) 056.5%
LDem45 072.6%
Total:158 5231.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Elis-Thomas Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Greengross Crossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive