[S1M-1609.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 1 Feb 2001 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S1M-1609.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-02-01 is:
*S1M-1609.1 Mr John Swinney: Working together for Scotland: a Programme for Government—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1609) in the name of Henry McLeish, leave out from "endorses" to end and insert "condemns the use of valuable Parliamentary time and public resources for an exercise in spin and calls for the Parliament to take on the powers of a normal Parliament which would enable it to use all of the resources of Scotland to address the social and economic priorities determined by the people of Scotland." Supported by: Brian Adam*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1609.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S1M-1609.1, in the name of John Swinney, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1609, in the name of Henry McLeish, on "Working Together for Scotland", be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 17 | 0 | 0 | 89.5% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 81.8% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 29 | 0 | 87.9% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 77 | 33 | 0 | 85.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||