[S1M-1627.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 8 Feb 2001 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-1627.2
The description in the bulletin on 2001-02-08 is:
*S1M-1627.2 Peter Peacock: Abolition of Council Tax—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1627) in the name of Tommy Sheridan, leave out from first "believes" to end and insert "welcomes the substantial reforms that the Executive has brought to the operation of local government finance by the delivery of three-year budget figures for grant, by the removal of expenditure guidelines and by increasing the funding of councils; further welcomes the indications from the Executive that it will pursue further reforms in the future, and notes that the Local Government Committee of the Parliament is to conduct an investigation into the financing of local government." Supported by: Angus MacKay*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1627.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S1M-1627.2, in the name of Peter Peacock, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1627, in the name of Tommy Sheridan, on the abolition of council tax, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 84.2% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
| SNP | 0 | 29 | 0 | 87.9% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 62 | 48 | 1 | 86.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||