[S1M-1699.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 1 Mar 2001 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S1M-1699.2
The description in the bulletin on 2001-03-01 is:
*S1M-1699.2 Mary Scanlon: Primary Care—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1699) in the name of Susan Deacon, leave out from "affirms" to end and insert "further calls upon the Scottish Executive to address urgently the serious problem of low morale among GPs and the associated issues of workload, bureaucracy and lack of resources, and to look to greater recognition of and partnership with community-based health professionals in order to ensure greater utilisation of local services and to put the patient at the heart of the NHS."
You can search for this motion (S1M-1699.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S1M-1699.2, in the name of Mary Scanlon, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1699, in the name of Susan Deacon, on primary care, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 89.5% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
SNP | 0 | 29 | 0 | 87.9% |
SSP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Total: | 61 | 49 | 2 | 87.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |