Health and Social Care Bill — 22 Mar 2001 at 17:28

Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.

[Amendments Nos. 221 and 222 not moved.]

moved Amendments Nos. 223 and 224:

Page 42, line 29, after "in" insert "or by virtue of".
Page 42, line 30, at end insert--

"( ) for a period which must elapse before an application, or a further application, may be made under section 49M(5)(a) above;".

On Question, amendments agreed to.

Clause 34, as amended, agreed to.

[Amendment No. 225 not moved.]

Clause 35 [Pilot schemes]:

moved Amendment No. 226:

Page 44, line 26, leave out "(other than practitioner dispensing services)".

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 226) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 68; Not-Contents, 99.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 62 (+2 tell)28.6%
Crossbench6 25.0%
Lab90 (+2 tell) 046.7%
LDem1 01.6%
Total:97 6425.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Brabazon of TaraCrossbenchaye
Lord Walton of DetchantCrossbench (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive