[S1M-1794] Decision Time — 28 Mar 2001 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S1M-1794
The description in the bulletin on 2001-03-27 is:
*S1M-1794 Andrew Wilson: Financial Powers of the Parliament—That the Parliament notes that the current devolution settlement gives the Scottish Parliament fewer financial powers than any other Parliament in the world; further notes that, while devolution is a recognition of the need for and desirability of policy divergences within the United Kingdom, the financial settlement underpinning it is designed explicitly to produce convergence in public expenditure; recognises that two thirds of Scots already support the devolution of full financial powers to the Scottish Parliament, and calls on the Scottish Executive to respond to this growing consensus and bring forward proposals to deliver full financial powers to the Parliament.
The description in the bulletin on 2001-03-28 is:
S1M-1794 Financial Powers of the Parliament (lodged on 26 March 2001) Shona Robison*, Dorothy-Grace Elder*, Mr Kenneth Gibson*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1794) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fifth question is, that motion S1M-1794, in the name of Andrew Wilson, on the financial powers of the Scottish Parliament, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 89.5% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 52 | 0 | 0 | 94.5% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 67 | 50 | 0 | 91.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |