Armed Forces Bill — Extension of jurisdiction — 2 Apr 2001
As considered in the Select Committee, further considered.
Clauses 1 to 5 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
Question put and agreed to.
Clause 6 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
Question put and agreed to.
Clause 7 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
Question put and agreed to.
Clause 8 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clauses 9 to 14 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
Question put and agreed to.
Clause 15 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clauses 16 and 17 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Schedule 1 agreed to.
Clauses 18 and 19 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Schedule 2 agreed to.
Clauses 20 to 22 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Question proposed, That this schedule be the Third schedule to the Bill.
Question put and agreed to.
Schedule 3 agreed to.
Clauses 23 to 26 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
Question put and agreed to.
Clause 27 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clauses 28 and 29 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Schedule 4 agreed to.
Clause 30 ordered to stand part of the Bill .
I beg to move amendment No. 2, in clause 31, page 32, line 11, after "operation", insert--
'except in matters relating to a serious crime or police raid;'.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
I beg to move amendment No. 4, in page 32, line 13, after "privileges", insert--
', and be subject to the code of conduct and disciplinary procedures,'.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
It being half-past Nine o'clock , The First Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means put the Question, pursuant to Orders [7 November 2000 and this day]:--
The Committee divided: Ayes 308, Noes 128.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 105 (+2 tell) | 0 | 66.9% |
| DUP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 307 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 74.1% |
| LDem | 0 | 15 | 0 | 31.9% |
| PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| SNP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16.7% |
| UUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 22.2% |
| Total: | 308 | 128 | 0 | 68.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||