[S1M-1884] Decision Time — 3 May 2001 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S1M-1884
The description in the bulletin on 2001-04-30 is:
*S1M-1884 Mr Murray Tosh: Changes to Standing Orders—That the Parliament (a) approves the recommendations of the Procedures Committee’s 1st Report, 2001, Changes to Chapters 9 and 9A of the Standing Orders of the Scottish Parliament (SP Paper 316) and agrees to amend the Parliament’s Standing Orders in accordance with Annexe A and Annexe B (Appendix B) to the Report and (b) agrees that these amendments to the Standing Orders come into force on 4 May 2001 and that the amendments set out in paragraphs 1 and 3 of Annexe B (Appendix B) to the Report shall apply only in relation to Bills introduced on or after that date. Supported by: Mr Kenneth Macintosh*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1884) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are seven questions to be put to the chamber. I ask members to check that the light in front of their card is out. The first question is, that motion S1M-1884, in the name of Murray Tosh, on changes to standing orders, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 78.9% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 48 | 1 | 2 | 92.7% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 28 | 0 | 0 | 84.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 108 | 3 | 3 | 89.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
John McAllion | Dundee East | Lab | no |
John Home Robertson | East Lothian | Lab | abstention |
Elaine Smith | Coatbridge and Chryston | Lab | abstention |