[S1M-2164] Decision Time — 6 Sep 2001 at 16:20
This looks like the vote on S1M-2164
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-05 is:
*S1M-2164 Sarah Boyack: Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill be passed. Supported by: Lewis Macdonald*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2164) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S1M-2164, in the name of Sarah Boyack, that the Erskine Bridge Toll Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 94.7% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 85.5% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 69.7% |
Total: | 78 | 26 | 0 | 82.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |