Financial Services and Markets Tribunal Rules 2001 — 23 Oct 2001 at 16:43

rose to move, That this House calls upon Her Majesty's Government to withdraw the rules (S.I. 2001/2476) and replace them with rules that preserve the confidentiality of proceedings in the Financial Services Appeals Tribunal.

On Question, Whether the said Motion shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 129; Not-Contents, 140.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 112 (+2 tell)49.8%
Crossbench4 129.2%
Green0 1100.0%
Judge1 020.0%
Lab133 (+2 tell) 067.5%
LDem0 11.5%
UUP0 1100.0%
Total:138 12739.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Lord Alton of LiverpoolCrossbenchno
Lord Chan Crossbenchno
Lord Roll of IpsdenCrossbenchno
Lord Williamson of HortonCrossbench (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive