[S1M-2520.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 6 Dec 2001 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S1M-2520.2
The description in the bulletin on 2001-12-06 is:
*S1M-2520.2 Irene McGugan: Improving Scotland's Youth Justice System to Build Safer Communities—As an amendment to motion (S1M-2520) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, insert at end "; calls upon the Scottish Executive to implement in full the recommendations of the Advisory Group Report on Youth Crime Review, focussing particularly on the proposed national strategy and the review of the age of criminal responsibility; notes the crisis in the recruitment of social workers for children and family services, and, given that the problem of youth crime needs to be seen in the wider context of social justice and in order to measure progress, further calls on the Scottish Executive to bring forward an annual report to the Parliament on the status of all of Scotland’s vulnerable children. Supported by: Michael Matheson*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2520.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S1M-2520.2, in the name of Irene McGugan, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2520, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on improving Scotland's youth justice system, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 78.9% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 53 | 0 | 0 | 96.4% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 0 | 26 | 0 | 78.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 83 | 31 | 0 | 89.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |