Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill [HL] — 7 Dec 2001 at 13:52

Clause 5 [Advertising: defences]:

[Amendment No. 32 not moved.]

moved Amendment No. 33:

Page 2, line 38, leave out Xhad no reason to suspect" and insert Xcould not reasonably have been expected to know"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 33) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 16; Not-Contents, 55.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con2 13 (+2 tell)7.4%
Crossbench5 13.4%
Lab26 (+1 tell) 013.5%
LDem21 (+1 tell) 033.3%
Total:54 1410.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Hayhoe Conno
Lord Monson Crossbenchaye
Baroness Perry of SouthwarkConno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive